Re: CaFTR A question about RF/attachment
Karin Ensink
(22 Apr 2016 16:04 CEST)
|
RE: CaFTR A question about RF/attachment
Geoffrey Goodman
(22 Apr 2016 16:43 CEST)
|
Re: CaFTR A question about RF/attachment Karin Ensink (22 Apr 2016 16:51 CEST)
|
RE: CaFTR A question about RF/attachment
Geoffrey Goodman
(22 Apr 2016 17:04 CEST)
|
Hi Geoff and all I am thinking about an attachment projective or story completion test for children that we used at the Anna Freud Centre - it will be mentioned in the 2008 validation study that Yael Schmeuli Goetz, Mary Target and Peter Fonagy published, as they used this to validate the the CAI. I can find it over the weekend, but it will be mentioned in that validation paper. Warm regards Karin Le 2016-04-22 10:43, « list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org on behalf of Geoffrey Goodman » <list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org on behalf of Geoffrey.Goodman@liu.edu> a écrit : >Hi Karin, > >These are great suggestions. You mentioned an attachment picture >completion task. Are you thinking of the Adult Attachment Projective >(Carol George's instrument) or something else? > >Geoff > >Geoff Goodman, Ph.D., ABPP, FIPA, CST, CSAT-S, CMAT-S, RPT-S >Associate Professor >Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program >Long Island University >720 Northern Blvd. >Brookville, NY 11548 >(516) 299-4277 >http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/ggoodman/home.htm >http://www.rurallibrariesresearchnetwork.com >________________________________________ >From: list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org >[list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org] on behalf of Karin Ensink >[Karin.Ensink@psy.ulaval.ca] >Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:03 AM >To: caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org >Subject: Re: CaFTR A question about RF/attachment > >Dear Anna-Karin > >I think your idea to continue with the CAI is a good one. You can rate >the CAI for RF and you might want to focus specifically on the questions >regarding self descriptions as hopefully you will see a consolidation of >self and development in mentalizing regarding self (especially if there >is an intervention that helps the children to develop this specifically). > I think it is tricky to rate attachment with an attachment interview for >this population because the question is attachment to who? I assume >foster carers? I would wonder whether an attachment picture completion >type of test may not be better as it looks at representation that is not >linked to a specific carer or parent (as in the CAI), so you would be >able to see the change in inner representation more easily. It also does >not rely so much on language as the CAI, something that may be an issue >in this population. > >To follow up on Geoff¹s suggestion regarding the RFQ, I attach the >validation article. We have validated the RFQuestionnaire, but the this >is really designed for adolescents and I think younger children may have >difficulties with the questions. Perhaps a brief version could work, but >given that it is not validated for children, that would be a drawback. >The correlation between RFQ and RF on the CAI is also relatively weak >(.3) so it does not measure the same thing. > >As you will see from the attached articles Child RF correlates with >psychopatho. RFQ also does. The question is really what would be best >to measure change in representations and mentalizing abilities, isn¹t it. > I would tend to go for the RF coding of the self representation >questions in the CAI. RF about others may also be interesting to look at >but I am not sure that it will function as a measure of change for this >population. > >I would be interest in hearing what Nick Midgley will pitch in as I think >he is involved with studying a similar population in London. > >If you have more questions about measuring child and adolescent RF you >are welcome to contact me and discuss backchannel. > >Warm regards >Karin Ensink > >De : ><list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:list-manager@psychotherapyr >esearch.org>> on behalf of Anna-Karin Åkerman ><anna-karin@tjustbehandlingsfamiljer.se<mailto:anna-karin@tjustbehandlings >familjer.se>> >Répondre à : >"caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org>" ><caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org>> >Date : vendredi 22 avril 2016 04:18 >À : >"caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org>" ><caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org>> >Objet : CaFTR A question about RF/attachment > >Hello! > >We would like to consult with you on the question of useful instruments >for rating attachment and change of it in children and adolescents in >foster homes. We are planning a study with the aim to assess change in >attachment security among children and adolescents (about 8 to 18 years >old) who are treated in foster homes in Sweden. Some of them stay for a >year or two before they move back to their biological parents, some stay >until they start living on their own. We have some clinical experience of >the Child Attachment Interview. This might be a feasible instrument but >as it is quite time-consuming we want to know what alternatives there are >before staring the study. > >We also intend to study the mental representations of the foster parents >of their relationship to the child. We have some experience of rating RF >on PDI but have not used it for attachment-to-the-child ratings. We also >considered WMCI but that seems to be made for smaller children. > >We also intend to rate RF on both foster families and the >children/adolescents, by using the PDI for the parents and probably the >CAI for the children (although we have used AAI for RF ratings down to >about 14 years. Do you have any good ideas about this? > >Some of our questions when selecting instruments are whether we can use >the same instruments over this long age span (8-18), how sensitive the >instruments are to change, how often they can be used (preferably once a >year in order to get information from those who leave after a short time). > >We hope that you have some ideas about these questions. > >Thank you in advance > >Anna-Karin Åkerman >Rolf Holmqvist > >Linköping University > > > > > >Dear colleague, to unsubscribe please use the following URL: >http://archives.simplelists.com >Dear colleague, to unsubscribe please use the following URL: >http://archives.simplelists.com >Dear colleague, to unsubscribe please use the following URL: > >http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=ZPKwYMn694eTFwxxjcpWn9vQ5pXrIope