Hi Geoff

I was involved in a practice-research network set up by the British
Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy that developed an evaluation
toolkit.  This included a number of recommended measures related to
outcomes and process evaluations.  The group was free to join (even for
non members) and can be accessed here:

http://www.bacp.co.uk/schools/index.php

The resources tab provided access to the document I mentioned.  In summary
I think the major easy to complete measures recommended, alongside the
yp-core were the session rating scale and the outcome rating scale.

Also it might be useful to know that there is a session or two in the
Counselling MindED resource related to embedding process and outcome
measures into routine practice.  This is the link for this (it¹s a great
free resource too):

https://www.minded.org.uk/course/category.php?viewtype=program&id=15

I hope that¹s of some use

All the best

Terry

Dr Terry Hanley CPsychol AFBPsS | Senior Lecturer in Counselling
Psychology | Ellen Wilkinson Building, A6.15 | University of Manchester |
Oxford Road | M13 9PL | tel: +44 (0)161 275 8815 | email:
terry.hanley@manchester.ac.uk (preferred contact) | skype: terry.s.hanley
| new twitter accounts @DrTerryHanley [personal twitter] @UoMCounsPsych
[programme twitter]
Editor of Counselling Psychology Review
<http://dcop.bps.org.uk/publications/cpr.cfm>
Editorial Board member of Counselling Psychology Quarterly
<http://www.tandfonline.com/action/aboutThisJournal?journalCode=ccpq20>
and The British Journal of Guidance and Counselling
<http://www.tandfonline.com/action/aboutThisJournal?journalCode=cbjg>

**New publications**
For a list of new publications (including some downloadable articles)
please check
out:http://www.manchester.ac.uk/research/Terry.Hanley/publications

Hanley, T. Lennie, C. & West, W. (2013). Introducing Counselling and
Psychotherapy Research. London: Sage

Hanley, T. , Humphrey, N. & Lennie, C. (Eds.) (2013). Adolescent
counselling psychology: theory, research and practice. London: Routledge

On 30/03/2015 18:54, "Geoffrey Goodman" <Geoffrey.Goodman@liu.edu> wrote:

>Hi Karin,
>
>Because the population is high-risk but not clinical, there is no
>specific clinical focus.  MBT obviously targets improvements or
>enhancements in mentalization skills and social competence, so any
>measures that target mentalization and social competence in this age
>range would be welcome.  Similarly, we are expecting the psychodrama
>groups to experience enhancements in mentalization skills and social
>competence, so we would be looking for similar measures.  If I had to
>pick an endpoint outcome, it would be higher self-esteem and emotion
>regulation (what early adolescent doesn't need help in these areas?).
>
>Geoff
>
>Geoff Goodman, Ph.D., ABPP, FIPA, CST, CSAT-S, CMAT-S
>Associate Professor
>Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program
>Long Island University
>720 Northern Blvd.
>Brookville, NY 11548
>(516) 299-4277
>http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/ggoodman/home.htm
>________________________________________
>From: list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org
>[list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org] on behalf of Karin Ensink
>[Karin.Ensink@psy.ulaval.ca]
>Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 9:13 AM
>To: caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org
>Cc: caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org
>Subject: Re: CaFTR pre-post outcome measures; process measures
>
>Dear Geoff
>
>Does the intervention have a specific focus? I would strongly suggest a
>measure as close to the focus as possible, as that is where you are most
>likely to see change ie emotion regulation or self perception.
>
>Warm regards
>Karin
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 30, 2015, at 9:03 AM, "Geoffrey Goodman"
>><Geoffrey.Goodman@liu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am planning to mount an intervention study of two group treatment
>>models (group MBT and a psychodrama group) in two middle schools with
>>students ages 12-13.  I would like suggestions of both outcome and
>>process measures that would fit these parameters.  One caveat is that
>>parents and teachers will not be available to complete any measures, so
>>that leaves the therapists and the children themselves.  I've scanned
>>the CORE system instruments, and the YP-CORE looks promising for the
>>children to complete, but I'm wondering if there are other instruments
>>with adequate validity/reliability that therapists or students could
>>complete.  These students are high-risk but not on a clinical spectrum.
>>Also, if anyone can recommend weekly process measures, to be completed
>>by either the therapist or student, that would also be great.  Then we
>>could attempt a time-series analysis of the data.  Thank you all in
>>advance for your help.
>>
>> Geoff Goodman
>>
>> Geoff Goodman, Ph.D., ABPP, FIPA, CST, CSAT-S, CMAT-S
>> Associate Professor
>> Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program
>> Long Island University
>> 720 Northern Blvd.
>> Brookville, NY 11548
>> (516) 299-4277
>> http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/ggoodman/home.htm