Thanks, Geoff.

For those interested in submitting something for the next SPR conference, there are 5 categories or types of presentation: Panels, Brief Papers, Structured Discussions, Posters, and Pre-Conference Workshops. Details about how each of these work can be found in the latest SPR newsletter:

http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.psychotherapyresearch.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/october_2014.pdf

As panels (which are most common) usually involve combining 3 or 4 short presentations on related themes, I would support Geoff's idea of people using this e-forum to share ideas you might have for a paper, so that you may be able to find other people with similar interests who can combine to make up a panel...

For some of you Philadelphia may be a long way to travel, but from personal experience of previous SPR conferences, it is certainly worth it - imagine being surrounded by hundreds of people who all share your enthusiasm for (child and family) psychotherapy research! (OK, that may not be the best sales pitch you've ever heard...). The conference is also very welcoming to novice researchers, especially trainees.

There is also an SPR Europe conference planned for Austria next year - we'll share details about it in due course.

Best wishes,

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org [mailto:list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey Goodman
Sent: 28 October 2014 17:53
To: caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org
Subject: CaFTR 2015 SPR meeting in Philadelphia

Hi Everyone,

My name is Geoff Goodman, and I am the USA representative on the CaFTR steering committee.  The annual SPR meeting will be held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (USA) from June 24 to June 27, 2015.  We would like to encourage CaFTR members to create a strong presence at next year's meeting; toward that end, we are encouraging folks to submit papers, posters, and panel ideas to present at the conference.  The dates for submission will be November 3 to December 5 (Friday), 2014, so there is plenty of time to organize.  Personally, I am involved in child psychotherapy process research, most notably with the Child Psychotherapy Process Q-Set (CPQ).  I am attaching two abstracts of recent papers that I and my colleagues have recently submitted for publication.  If anyone is conducting research in a similar area, please contact me so that we can talk about organizing a panel.  If you have any questions about the upcoming SPR conference, please feel free to use the listserv as a forum, or you can e-mail me directly (ggoodman@liu.edu).  A special thanks to Nick for organizing us and making this listserv a reality!

Geoff Goodman

Geoff Goodman, Ph.D., ABPP, FIPA, CST, CSAT-S, CMAT-S Associate Professor Clinical Psychology Doctoral Program Long Island University
720 Northern Blvd.
Brookville, NY 11548
(516) 299-4277
http://myweb.cwpost.liu.edu/ggoodman/home.htm
________________________________________
From: list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org [list-manager@psychotherapyresearch.org] on behalf of Gunnar Carlberg [gunnar.carlberg@ericastiftelsen.se]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:50 AM
To: caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org
Subject: CaFTR: New publications

Dear Colleagues,
My name is Gunnar Carlberg connected to the Erica Foundation, Stockholm and Stockholm University, Sweden. The main focus of my research is outcome and change processes in psychodynamic child and adolescent psychotherapy.
I am part of the CaFTR steering group. In our planning and discussions about how to use this network caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org<mailto:caftr@psychotherapyresearch.org> we have thought of the opportunity to use it as a platform to share information about journal articles that may be of interest. I give this mail the subject heading ‘CaFTR: New publications’.

Recently we published two articles that may be of interest for some of you.
Nemirovski Edlund, J., Thorén, A. & Carlberg, G. (2014). Outcome of psychodynamic child psychotherapy in routine practice. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling. 16, 228-244. DOI: 10.1080/13642537.2014.927381
ABSTRACT: The aim of the present naturalistic study was to explore the effectiveness of psychodynamic child psychotherapy in routine practice. The sample comprised 207 psychotherapies with children 4–12 years of age with a broad range of mental health problems. Data on two measures, children’s global assessment scale (CGAS) and strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), were collected pre-post therapy. Within-group changes were analysed using repeated measures mixed-models ANOVA. Individual changes were examined by means of clinical significance. The analyses revealed improvement in general functioning, decrease in problem severity and problem impact on the child’s everyday life, as well as an increase in prosocial behaviour. For CGAS, an interaction effect was discovered suggesting a larger improvement for younger children (4–6 years) than for older children (10–12 years). After therapy, 38% (n 76) achieved clinically significant improvement. Time-limited psychotherapy proved favourable for children assigned to that particular treatment modality. The study generated similar results as previous well-controlled trials, revealing statistically significant results in a large sample and in spite the use of non-specific outcome measures. The study provides everyday evidence to the effectiveness of child psychodynamic treatment with parallel parental work for a broad range of child mental health problems.

The second article was just published online.
Nemirovski Edlund, J. & Carlberg, G. (2014). Psychodynamic psychotherapy with adolescents and young adults: Outcome in routine practice. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. DOI: 10.1177/1359104514554311 ABSTRACT This naturalistic study examined the outcome of psychodynamic psychotherapy with 218 adolescents and young adults aged 14-24 years. Analysis of variance showed significant improvement of general functioning on Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and decreased symptom severity on Symptoms Checklist-90 (SCL-90) upon completion of psychotherapy, as well as a clinically significant improvement in a large percentage of cases. Effect sizes were equivalent to those evident in a clinical comparison group and larger than in prior research. The main limitation of this study was the lack of a control group, partially compensated for through the use of comparison groups and high external validity. The study seeks to fill a gap in an important yet overlooked field of research.
Best wishes,
Gunnar Carlberg

Remember: We hope that using this e-forum will be fairly easy. If you wish to post something, simply send an email and all members of this e-forum (already over 200) will receive your email. You can reply to messages by using ‘reply to all’. (If for some reason you want to reply privately to a person who sent a message, please use their personal email address). If you are starting a new topic, it would be helpful if you can put the topic name in the ‘subject’ line, so that others can see what your email is about.